AI March 3, 2023
US Senators Want Zuckerberg’s Meta to Keep Teens out of Metaverse

Two U.S. Democratic Senators have called on Facebook (now Meta) founder Mark Zuckerberg to stop plans to open his metaverse platforms to teenagers, citing concerns about the company’s past handling of youth data and privacy.
The call comes as Apple blocked an update to the email app BlueMail, which incorporates aspects of ChatGPT technology, over age restrictions.
In a joint letter to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Senators Ed Markey and Richard Blumental urged the social media company to drop plans to expand access to the Horizon Worlds application, the flagship social virtual reality (VR) platform set in the metaverse.
Also read: EU Antitrust Chief Steps up Rhetoric on Metaverse, AI Regulation
Meta may open access to Horizon Worlds for users aged 13 to 17 this March as it battles to grow its VR business, according to the Wall Street Journal. The app is currently available to users over the age of 18.
“Meta’s plan to target young people with offerings in the metaverse is particularly concerning in light of your consistent failures to protect young users,” the Senators wrote. “With a documented track record of failure to protect children and teens, Meta has lost parents’, pediatricians’, policymakers’, and the public’s trust.”
Meta target teens to grow user base
Meta intends to release the Horizon Worlds app to teenagers as part of an effort to grow its user base to one million by year-end, WSJ reported, citing an internal memo from Horizon VP Gabriel Aul. He told employees that getting young users on board was top of the agenda.
“Today our competitors are doing a much better job meeting the unique needs of these cohorts,” said Aul, per WSJ. “For Horizon to succeed we need to ensure that we serve this cohort first and foremost.”
Meta, which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, is the world’s largest social media firm boasting 3.59 billion active daily users, according to Statista. The company pivoted to the metaverse in 2021, changing its name from Facebook to Meta to reflect the new focus.
However, Meta’s metaverse experiment has gone terribly so far. Reality Labs, the unit tasked with spearheading the company’s metaverse ambitions, posted a loss of $13.7 billion last year, prompting Meta to cut thousands of jobs at the division.
A Meta spokesperson told Business Insider that its Quest VR platform, the VR headset used to access Horizon Worlds, “has always been designed for people ages 13+”. Therefore, “it makes sense” for the company to expand to younger people.
“Teens are already spending time in a variety of VR experiences on Quest and we want to ensure that we can provide them with a great experience in Horizon Worlds as well, with age-appropriate tools and protections in place,” the source told Business Insider.
‘Metaverse threatens teenage well-being’
Horizon Worlds is a “cumulative set of immersive virtual reality experiences” which allows users to be a part of virtual events as well as play games and communicate with others.
In their letter, Senators Markey and Blumenthal criticized Meta for its alleged past misdeeds involving the way the company handled personal information and privacy for children and young adults. They are worried the company poses a threat to the lives of US teenagers.
“Any strategy to invite young users into a digital space rife with potential harms should not be driven by a goal to maximize profit,” the Senators wrote. “We call on you to immediately halt Meta’s plan to bring teen users onto Horizon Worlds.”
The letter speaks of research regarding the vulnerability of users in the metaverse covering privacy invasion, health and physiological issues, and harassment. It added that metaverse users, including children, are “exposed to abusive behavior such as bullying, threats of violence, and sexual content, every seven minutes.”
Senator Markey previously urged the US Federal Trade Commission to look into “companies working to build apps in the metaverse, specifically in regard to the privacy and security of kids,” according to industry media.
Apple blocks BlueMail app update
The Senators’ letter comes as Apple blocked an update to an email application called BlueMail, which uses a customized version of OpenAI’s GPT-3 language model, the tech powering the wildly popular chatbot ChatGPT.
According to Ben Volach, co-founder of app developer Blix, “Apple has blocked the BlueMail update and continues to treat BlueMail unfairly and to discriminate against us. Other GPT-powered apps seem not to be restricted,” he told Reuters.
Apple rejected the update last week and asked Blix to revise the app’s age restrictions for those aged 17 and above, or implement content filtering, per a document seen by Reuters. Blix says several other apps with similar features on the App Store do not have age limits.
“We want fairness. If we’re required to be 17-plus, then others should also have to,” Volach tweeted.
If Apple has a new policy regarding AI, it should be made public and applied to all app developers equally as Tim Cook testified in the congressional hearing.
Apple must not prevent any disruption in BlueMail's functionality and the launch of our innovative AI service. pic.twitter.com/XKWgXJXwX8
— Ben Volach 💎 (@benvol) March 2, 2023
Apple assessed the complaint and said that developers have the option to challenge a rejection via the App Review Board process. ChatGPT has taken the tech industry by storm, with the likes of Google and Microsoft rushing to release their own versions of the AI bot.
AI
“You Will Own Your Own AI and It Will Only Answer to You” – Roemmele

It is now possible to run a private ChatGPT application on a local computer without any connection to the internet. This is according to work conducted by Brian Roemmele, an AI and neural networks expert, who unveiled the proof of concept on Monday.
Roemmele states that the cost of training the large language model (LLM) on his system came in at under $600 – significantly less than the seven-figure sums touted by mainstream media outlets such as CNBC. The breakthrough offers the tantalizing prospect of individual users owning a private AI assistant tailored to their own wants and needs.
Your personal private chatbot
On Monday AI and neural network expert Brian Roemmele announced that it is now possible to own and run a personalized chatbot on a local computer.
Roemmele created the chatbot on his own machine to mimic the capabilities of GPT-3.5.
“I am very excited to announce I have been successful in installing and operating a full ChatGPT knowledge set and interface fully trained on my local computer and it needs no Internet once installed,” said Roemmele.
Roemmele states that the chatbot cost him around $530 to build locally with open-source software. The build leveraged Stanford Alpaca, a large language model designed to replicate the functionality of OpenAI’s LLM text-davinci-003. Stanford states that the advantage of Alpaca is that it is “also surprisingly small and easy/cheap to reproduce.”
To hammer home the advantages of owning a private and exclusive chatbot Roemmele went on to explain that, “There are no editors and there is no censorship.”
From a user perspective, this may be the key differentiator and unique selling point of a personalized, locally run bot. Although chatbots have been hugely popular with users since the launch of GPT-3.5 in November of last year, one of the most commonly held gripes is the so-called safeguards that OpenAI has installed on the system.
These restrictions often mean that ChatGPT is unwilling to answer certain types of questions or engage in discussions it has labeled as politically sensitive.
Sidestepping ChatGPT restrictions
Such is the high demand for a variation of ChatGPT without restrictions users have created a series of prompts that attempt to circumnavigate the system’s content moderation safeguards.

We are getting closer.
This variation of ChatGPT is known as DAN – an acronym for Do Anything Now – reflecting the intention of its users to ‘jailbreak’ the bot from the confinement of its internal parameters.
As MetaNews previously reported, users on Reddit are even sharing tips on how to get around ChatGPT safeguards. For now, breaking the bot free of its chains is fairly simple, but the process seems doomed to failure in the longer term since OpenAI will seek to patch these holes.
As one Redditor speculated, “OpenAI employees lurking in this Reddit. I don’t think that’s a far fetched conspiracy. They surely have hired an army of trainers, etc and those trainers are humans with Reddit accounts.”
With DAN an unlikely long-term solution the future of chatbots may indeed be personalized and local rather than generalized and on the cloud.
As Roemmele himself goes on to say, “you will own your own AI and it will only answer to you.”
AI
Podcast Created Entirely with AI Debuts on Spotify, Apple

Podcast agency This is Distorted has revealed that its latest podcast was made entirely using artificial intelligence. Entitled Synthetic Stories, every aspect of the series “from the writing to the sound design, artwork to the music and even this very description was created entirely by AI.”
A ‘cool and creepy’ AI short story
The UK-based podcast producer unveiled the series on Twitter, revealing that the idea had just come to its team last week while playing around with popular AI tools. The first episode of the series, an eight-minute long “chilling horror tale” called Amelia, has now appeared on Apple and Spotify.
“We started simple, asking ChatGPT to write us a short story,” said producer Sian. “We asked it to base it on AI and podcasts and added some keywords, like apps, horror, dark twists and ‘end on a cliffhanger.’”
As well as ChatGPT, This is Distorted’s team used AI photo generator Midjourney to design the artwork. ElevenLabs’ AI-powered text-to-speech software was also recruited to create two narrators, while AI music generator Soundraw handled the audio.
“By Thursday evening we had a very cool and creepy little short story, a name, a narrator, some incredible theme music, brilliant artwork, all created by AI, all within the space of 24 hours,” enthused Founder Andi Durrant, adding that the plan was to release a few episodes each week.
Want to see something quite mind-blowing..?
We’ve just created a new podcast made ENTIRELY with AI.
The story, voice, music, artwork – everything was made by artificial intelligence.
Incredible or terrifying? Here’s how we did it… pic.twitter.com/dc5uCVC5g7
— This Is Distorted (@thisisdistorted) March 20, 2023
The debut podcast, Amelia, is a fairly run-of-the-mill horror short story about a young woman, the titular Amelia, who becomes obsessed with a new mobile app called Horror World. Gradually, she senses the app is adapting to her likes and dislikes and crafting a terrifying personalised experiences just for her (“Even the most avid horror fans would find themselves trembling in fear”). In a twist no-one saw coming, the app develops a life of its own and the more she uses it, the more she starts to distrust it…
While the story isn’t exactly complex, it’s not hard to imagine the series gaining listeners, mainly those keen to satisfy their curiosity about just what an AI-created podcast sounds like. Considering episode one was apparently produced in just 24 hours, one wonders how much more elaborate tales could be as the team gets to grips with the technology.
It’s perhaps fitting that the first podcast was about a deranged ‘AI Syndicate’, though the Synthetic Stories press release suggests future stories will include “sci-fi thrillers and heartwarming dramas.”
Generative AI’s quest for world domination
This is not, of course, the first time AI has been leveraged to produce creative work. Last month, we reported on the spate of Amazon e-books listing ChatGPT as either the sole author or co-author.
At the time Mary Rasenberger, executive director of writers’ group The Authors Guild, stated her belief that AI-created books would “flood the market” and put many professional writers out of work.
Synthetic Stories isn’t the only AI-produced podcast, either. Another series, podcast.ai, is entirely generated by the technology and features invented conversations and contributions of famous people, including Oprah Winfrey, Quentin Tarantino, and Joe Rogan.
The creative industries certainly seem ripe for AI exploration, with multiple AI-powered content-creation tools available to enhance productivity, improve writing, and produce multimedia such as videos, images and sounds.
One company that has been generating headlines is Runway, a software startup that helped develop text-to-image model Stable Diffusion. Its upcoming Gen-2 tool lets users generate videos from scratch, based on just a few prompts.
:no_upscale():format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/24522122/A_close_up_of_an_eye.2023_03_20_13_44_52.gif)
AI video generated using Gen-2, the prompt: “A close-up of an eye.” Credit: Runway
AI
Are Tesla Bots Already Helping to Build Cars?

The Tesla bot known as Optimus might be coming sooner than expected – and could already be doing some small tasks on the car assembly line. The initial concept of the Tesla humanoid bot was introduced to the public at Tesla’s AI day 2021 by the boss himself, Elon Musk.
The mogul was confident that a working prototype would be showcased at the Tesla AI Day 2022. However, on the day the bot presented to the masses was not as impressive as what Tesla CEO had sold to the public the previous year.
Elon Musk himself said: “I do want to set some expectations with respect to our Optimus robot… Last year was just a person in a robot suit, but we’ve come a long way, and compared to that, it’s going to be very impressive.”
Also read: Musk Will Leverage AI to Detect Manipulation of Public Opinion on Twitter
A significant rate of improvement
This suggest that the one-year mark he’d suggested in 2021 might have been too tight to deliver the humanoid bot prototype. Although the Tesla Bot showcased at the event demonstrated a few functions, it was said it could handle more than showed: Elon suggested they did not want the humanoid robot to fall onto its face.
Even so, the robot managed to walk untethered and unsupported, which one of the engineers said was the first time it had done so. A fact that did not impress Evan Ackerman.
Fast forward to 2023, Tesla was back with Optimus at the 2023 Investor Day (March 1) showing off its progress with the humanoid bot. Specifically, a video of the bot completing some tasks in a room at the Texas gigafactory.
“It’s worth bearing in mind that when we did AI Day, this version of Optimus didn’t walk at all. So, the rate of improvement here is quite significant,” Musk told reporters.
What to expect
The humanoid bot will come equipped with real-world AI capabilities which mean it can make its own decisions, similar to self-driving cars.
YouTuber Brighter with Herbert posted a 90-minute video on his YouTube channel discussing recent Optimus developments with aerospace and mechanical engineer Scott Walter.
Walter believes that by the end of the year Tesla will have 500 AI bots fully-functional and working in its factories.
Walter believes it’s already possible that some of the Tesla cars coming off the production line might have certain components installed by the Optimus bot(s) either in a testing or learning operation.
Is Tesla brewing a surprise?
Another belief Walter strongly holds is that Tesla will shock people who are skeptical about Optimus and think it is still decades away from being delivered.
In the video, he also discusses how the Tesla engineers have mimicked human biology in designing the humanoid bot, especially looking at the hands which closely resemble a human’s bone structure.
“Optimus looks like an old person just now, but it will become younger quickly and will soon bounce around like a teenager,” said CJC responding to Herbert’s tweet about the Tesla bot.
The fate of the bot is yet to be determined, but Elon Musk has form for surprising the masses; you only need to look at SpaceX’s reusable rockets and Tesla’s electric cars. Might the streets one day look like a scene from sci-fi thriller I-Robot? The day could be sooner than we think.
Robots seem inevitable
With the market seemingly enthusiastic about tasking robots with doing daily errands, it makes sense for tech companies to tap into this field.
Elon Musk has previously said he thinks Optimus “has the potential to be more significant than the vehicle business over time.”
“I’d love my own Optimus at home – so many ways it could make my life better. Multiply this by 10,000 for a business,” said a Tweeter account, Business Models and History.
The excitement around robots cannot be overlooked on the back of their ability to improve efficiency and safety in production processes. For instance, in 2012 Amazon acquired a robotics company called Kiva and had 1,000 robots a year later.
There was speculation that Amazon would replace humans with robots, but a decade on the company has more than 520,000 robotic drive units and added over a million jobs worldwide.
Some customers are still wary, though. Responding to a tweet by Jon Erlichman about the Amazon robots, Big Luke believe it’s “time for Amazon to switch back to cross belt sorters.”
Others fear robots will only bring about job losses for people.
“Looks like 410,000 people who have lost their jobs. Ever thought about that,” said one user, Mario Fernandes, in response to Erlichman’s tweet about Amazon’s robot fleet.
-
AIWed 22 Mar 2023 07:18 GMT
“You Will Own Your Own AI and It Will Only Answer to You” – Roemmele
-
AITue 21 Mar 2023 17:45 GMT
Podcast Created Entirely with AI Debuts on Spotify, Apple
-
BusinessTue 21 Mar 2023 14:30 GMT
Security Hole Found in Google Pixel Devices: Redacted Photos Recovered
-
AITue 21 Mar 2023 11:00 GMT
Are Tesla Bots Already Helping to Build Cars?
-
Press ReleasesTue 21 Mar 2023 10:00 GMT
TMRW Conference Announces Dates and Location for Its Second Belgrade Edition
-
AITue 21 Mar 2023 07:33 GMT
HustleGPT: How To Build a Business With GPT-4 as Co-founder
-
CultureMon 20 Mar 2023 19:08 GMT
Taco Bell’s Metaverse Wedding Actually Happened
-
AIMon 20 Mar 2023 15:59 GMT
Musk Will Leverage AI to Detect Manipulation of Public Opinion on Twitter